Archive for Fred Williamson

The Inglorious Bastards (1978) Review

Posted in Inglorious Bastards, The (1978) with tags , , , , on August 8, 2012 by Last Road Reviews


**** ½ Out of 5

Tagline- Whatever the Dirty Dozen Did They Do It Dirtier!

Release Date- February 8th, 1978

Running Time- 99-Minutes

Rating- R

Screenplay-Sandro Continenza, Sergio Grieco, Romano Migliorini, Laura Toscano, Franco Marotta

Director-Enzo G. Castellari

Starring- Bo Svenson, Fred Williamson, Peter Hooten, Michael Pergolani, Jackie Basehart, Debra Berger, Raimund Harmstorf and Ian Bannen as Col. Buckner

Released in 1978 this cult classic has gotten a new lease on life with the release of Quentin Tarantino’s movie under the same name just Bastards is spelled Basterds. Outside of the WWII setting the movies are quite different and Tarantino’s movie really isn’t a remake, but more inspired by if anything. I’ve only seen a couple of films by Enzo G. Castellari those being 1990 Bronx Warriors and The New Barbarians and while I didn’t hate either I wasn’t a huge fan, but one day I’ll revist them and see if I can get more into them, but due to that I wasn’t really sure what to expect out of The Inglorious Bastards, but in the end I have to say this was a great film that truly deserves a wider audience.

The plot focuses on a group of US soldiers being transported to military prison for various reasons and on their way the convoy is attacked by Nazis, which leads to the soldiers escaping and the plan it to head to Switzerland, which is neutral so therefore they can avoid going to prison. As they try and make their way the Bastards end up signing up for a suicide mission.

The screenplay by Sandro Continenza, Sergio Grieco, Romano Migliorini, Laura Toscano, and Franco Marotta is light on plot and for the most part it’s never really made clear why some of the Bastards are being taken into custody and I’m kinda surprised it took so many writers since there again really wasn’t much in the way of plot. However with that said while the characters lack depth they are all entertaining and really fun and the script also features some really funny moments as well. I can forgive the light plot since I really liked all the main characters; as I stated before sure they might lack depth, but they do have their own identities and I really got attached to them and it kinda sucks when any of them get killed. Despite the flaws of the script it still works well with great characters, which is at times rare for Italian cinema and again the script is also really funny at times.

As director Enzo G. Castellari crafts a great and action packed movie that is well-paced and the movie is always fun and never once does anything lag. Inglorious Bastards has constant action throughout and any lulls in the action don’t last long. Unlike most Italian flicks of this nature it’s actually not very graphic. It’s violent, but not very gory; Castellari does a great job with the action sequences as they are fun and exciting and while they’re over the top at times, but yet it feels like it could all really happen. When there isn’t any action, Castellari handles the characters well and always keeps the movie running at a really great and exciting pace. Like I said I really didn’t know what to expect since I can’t say I loved the other 2 movie I have seen by Castellari, but Inglorious Bastards is truly a great movie and reminds me again why I love 70s cinema and personally see it as the best era.

The casting of the movie is excellent, which helps elevate the movie and sure the characters might lack depth, but the actors make far more out of them and that’s why I stated before you begin to get attached to them even if you don’t know a lot about them. Bo Svenson as Lt. Robert Yeager is great in the role of the leader of the group and like always Fred “the Hammer” Williamson as Canfield is a standout. Even though I singled out Svenson and Williamson all the actors were great and really make you root for the characters.

Overall The Inglorious Bastards is a truly great film with amazing action scenes and some really great comedic moments and my only regret is it took me so long to finally see this film. Like I said it’s quite different than the Tarantino movie, but it’s just as good and dare I say even better. The Inglorious Bastards comes highly recommended and if you haven’t seen it what are you waiting for go now and pick it up if you love 70s cult cinema you won’t be disappointed.
















Vigilante (1983) Review by Dave Kaye

Posted in Vigilante with tags , , , , , , on March 31, 2012 by Last Road Reviews

Review by Dave Kaye


**** Out of 5

Tagline- You’re Not Safe Anymore

Release Date- September 16th, 1983

Running Time- 89-Minutes

Rating- R

Screenplay- Richard Vetere

Director- William Lustig

Starring- Robert Forster, Rutanya Alda, Willie Colon, Woody Strode, Joe Spinell and Fred Williamson as Nick

After his stunning and highly controversial debut film Maniac, William Lustig returned with Vigilante released in 1983 and like Maniac, Vigilante is an exploitation flick at a time when the tide had mostly turned on these movies. Like his debut, Vigilante isn’t a perfect movie; it’s a little rough around the edges in some spots, but from that comes a raw and gritty feel much like Craven’s Last House on the Left and Hooper’s Texas Chainsaw Massacre. The fact that those films weren’t perfectly made adds something to them and had they been more polished they wouldn’t have come out nearly as well. In my opinion William Lustig is a highly underrated filmmaker and granted he may not be on the same level as someone like John Carpenter, Lustig, however in his own right is an excellent filmmaker and while I have enjoyed many of his films none were able to match the brilliance of his first two, which as I stated had this raw gritty edge to them.

Most people cite Vigilante as a knockoff of Death Wish and I’m quite sure William Lustig drew some inspiration from Death Wish, but with that said Vigilante also has a style all of its own. Let’s get one thing straight; Death Wish is the holy grail of the vigilante movie. Since its release in 1974 almost every vigilante movie since has been inspired by it even if the film is based on a comic or novel before Death Wish came out. To this day Death Wish in my opinion remains the best vigilante movie ever made and I don’t see anything topping it, but Lustig’s Vigilante in many areas can hold its own against Death Wish.

Factory worker Eddie Marino (Forster) has his life turned upside down by the brutal attack on his wife Vickie (Alda) that leaves his child killed in the process (more on that later), but when a corrupt judge (Beck) sets the leader of the gang free and then holds Eddie in contempt of court, Eddie breaks down and seeks vengeance on the ruthless gang of thugs that murdered his young son.

The marketing for the movie and even the poster art does sort of hint at an all-out action movie and while Vigilante does feature a lot of graphic violence the movie is much more driven by the characters and the moral dilemma of vigilance justice and writer, Richard Vetere does a good job at creating some interesting characters as well as creating a good moral dilemma on when vigilante justice goes too far and are the people doing this any better than the criminals? I’d say the answer is yes, since if the law doesn’t do anything about it somebody has to, but it does raise a good question on when things would go from doing the right thing to killing someone over a silly dispute. The characters may not be the best developed with the exception of Eddie, but all the characters however do add to the movie. Vetere writes a smart screenplay that sure obviously inspired by Death Wish, but it also has a lot more going for it than being a take on the classic Bronson movie.

Director William Lustig delivers a fun and exciting movie that also works on the dramatic level as well; while Vigilante isn’t a horror movie it does feature some highly suspenseful scenes such as the attack on Vickie, which has an eerie and unsettling feeling that is more on tune with a horror flick. New York in the 1970s and 1980s is quite different than today. Any big city will be plagued by crime, but NYC back in the 70s and 80s could be a very dangerous place that was very sleazy and Lustig manages to capture that feeling to perfection with both Maniac and Vigilante and I’d go as far to say Lustig captures that seedy feel NY once had better than most filmmakers and I’m sure being a New Yorker also helped that. While NY might be a big city with a lot of people, Lustig makes you feel the isolation of an ugly place and no matter where you are you aren’t safe and Lustig again really captures the ugliness of a big city ridden with crime. I’d go as far to say the only filmmaker to capture that era of NY better was Martin Scorsese.

While the pacing is very solid there are however a few scenes that tend to drag. When Eddie goes to prison its meant to show how screwed up the justice system is, which makes his decision to seek revenge make much more sense however I don’t think the scenes with Eddie in prison were needed as the point is already made clear and while it’s only a couple of scenes with Eddie in prison as during this time focus is put on the other characters this would really be my only real flaw with the movie.

William Lustig really delivers a very entertaining movie that works on both an action level, dramatic and deeper level. So many people get the wrong idea on exploitation flicks. Since the release of the Tarantino/Rodriguez movie Grindhouse everyone seems to think these films are only so good they’re bad and the real shame is people are missing out on some really great and deep movies and while Vigilante may not be the deepest and most powerful exploitation film to ever come around it does however deliver some good social commentary on vigilante justice and when it goes too far and this to me is prime example of exploitation flicks as movies like Last House on the Left and even Cannibal Holocaust work on a much deeper level than just the graphic violence and if anything I’d go as far to say movies like that are a far better example of exploitation filmmaking than movies like Pieces or Burial Ground. As I stated before Vigilante isn’t a non-stop action movie so those who are only used to a certain type of exploitation movie might be a little letdown, but when there is violence its quite graphic and brutal and fits the ugly tone set by Lustig from the very beginning of the movie,

Part of what also makes Vigilante so powerful is it features a young child brutally gunned down with a shotgun and while the death is off camera, we do however see the death from the outside yard, the shot is fired we see blood and the window being shattered this in part makes the scene so much more powerful since in general, filmmakers tend to shy away from killing children in movies and for the most part we know no harm will come to kids, but when it does happen like in Vigilante all bets are off and now you know anything is possible and nothing is off limits.

The fact a young child is brutally gun down with a shotgun blast is very unsettling and while again we don’t actually see the child get shot this scene really makes the movie all the more powerful and has really stuck with me years later and like I said by killing a young child we now know really anything can happen and Lustig keeps you guessing just how far the film will go. As popular as Maniac and Vigilante are it seems most people know William Lustig more from the Maniac Cop trilogy and while these are enjoyable films in my opinion they come nowhere near the level of Maniac and Vigilante and these two movies alone make William Lustig one of my favorite filmmakers. William Lustig has now gone onto be the CEO and founder of Blue-Underground and it’s great that Lustig is keeping the memory of cult cinema alive and this guy really deserves a lot more respect than he gets.

The performances in Vigilante are also very strong with Robert Forster putting in an excellent performance and since this movie has become a semi-regular for Lustig appearing in such movies as Maniac Cop III and Uncle Sam. Obviously people will compare Forster with Charles Bronson and Bronson is one of my favorite actors and one of the ultimate tough guys of film and as great as he was in Death Wish, Forster is much stronger in Vigilante. Again I love Bronson and he’s one of my all-time favorite actors, but he didn’t really have a lot of depth and really didn’t seem to show any emotion despite the horrible tragedies that happened to him whereas Forster shows more emotion and you can feel his pain, but he doesn’t overdo it. Cult actor Fred Williamson is excellent as Nick one of the vigilante’s trying to clean up the streets his own way and Joe Spinell the Maniac himself also appears in a brief role as a corrupt attorney.

Some people have complained over some of the loose ends the movie has and while I do understand complaints I feel as if everything was wrapped up. There does seem to be maybe a little unresolved issue between Eddie and his wife Vickie, but also its made clear as well and I suppose not much more was really needed, but I did feel there was a little more potential for that story and people complain about the ending and yeah it does sort of just end, but it’s pretty explosive (pun intended). Overall Vigilante is an excellent movie from a type of film no longer around; if you like gritty and rough exploitation flicks, Vigilante should be to your liking as Lustig delivers an excellent movie that raises some great social comments on society and as I stated it works as both an action movie, drama and a powerful piece of moral dilemma.

As I write this review and the more I think about the film it just might be better than Death Wish as a whole. Death Wish might be more pleasing, but Vigilante is raw and gritty and Lustig captures an ugliness NYC had at the time the film was made.